<p>Are we really going to get back on the fallacy train today kids? </p>
<p>blah</p>
<p>That is rich, hahahaha.</p>
<p><em>allie</em>,</p>
<p>Technically, there is no "fallacy train" since blackdream has not been correct on a single one.</p>
<p>By the way, did any of you know that blackdream used to be Area69? The same poster who tried to discourage others from applying to Stanford?</p>
<p>well, don't we all get tired from some f***ing forum nazi? Let's take the science route then.</p>
<p>Area69.. I mean blackdream, why did you attempt to discourage people from applying to Stanford?</p>
<p>"Area69.. I mean blackdream, why did you attempt to discourage people from applying to Stanford?"</p>
<p>Ad hominem abusive Fallacy</p>
<p>and You will make a great poltician one day.</p>
<p>Hmm at least nspeds answers questions that are asked of him, rather than avoid them like third period french class..</p>
<p>By the way, I love the sciences. I really would not mind a competent person providing a lecture in quantum mechanics!</p>
<p>Nikki422, so when your friend nspeds starts quoting fallacy, it's fine, and when I start to do it, I am avoiding questions?</p>
<p>Of course I would love to lecture on quantum mechanics, but some of its concepts are, unfortunately, beyond nsped's comprehension.</p>
<p>I mean, we all love physics for poets, but sometimes it just doesn't work out.</p>
<p>Blackdream, you have yet to be correct in your application of the fallacies.</p>
<p>no, quoting "fallacies" has nothing to do with the fact that you avoided the question that was asked of you..</p>
<p>
[quote]
but some of its concepts are, unfortunately, beyond nsped's comprehension.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>That is rich. I have actually read a couple of texts, but most of them deal with its implications on metaphysics.</p>
<p>cant we all juss get along?!</p>
<p>ok here goes... (dons black and white referee's jersey).</p>
<p>the purpose of this thread was to provide a way for us to appeal to the cc "bosses" by simply showing the opinions of the transfer posters as it relates to a sub-forum devoted to UC transfers, not to engage in meaningless arguing. If that's your goal, go start a thread and name it that. That way, the more belligerent among us can stop sidetracking other threads to the point of uselessness, and those who want to actually enjoy ourselves can avoid it.</p>
<p>and btw, blackdream, nspeds was making a joke when he pointed out that spelling error, not committing an "ad hominem personal attack," or whatever the heck u said. and btw, from what i recall from my critical thinking class, your classifications for fallacies are woefully incorrect.</p>
<p>i want a UC sub page... haha... think im a little late, but i missed all the fighting! Awesome!</p>