<p>My son, just finishing his freshman year, has run into a weird grading situation at Cornell. He says he got As on all the exams and assignments, yet earned a final grade of B+ for the course. He was a little surprised to not receive an A. It is for a humanities course, one that he took to fulfill a requirement.</p>
<p>I suggested emailing the professor, but he doesn't think it is worth it.</p>
<p>Of course, we have heard stories of weird grading and curving grades at Cornell ... I know it might be putting the cart before the horse, but it does concern me if he wishes to apply to a competitive graduate school later on. Do they/will they really take that into account?</p>
<p>I am a former college professor myself, and I don't really understand how such things work at Cornell. Grades I gave were always based on exams and assignments, and I never had a situation where someone who earned As all the way along ended up with less than an A for a final grade. I did curve grades at times, but I never "forced" a curve to the extent that someone with an A was "marked down."</p>
<p>It just seems strange to me, and a little unfair. Although, I have to say, we were warned about this very thing by former Cornellians--one who told us tales of students with grades of 90+ (median for the class) earning a C! (This was years ago.) I'm no advocate of grade inflation, but I'm not sure I'm a fan of the other extreme, either. (Yes, I know Princeton has a very strict grading policy, which I have heard about at length from a friend with a daughter there.) But it seems like if you earn a 90+ you should get an above average grade, and, if you earn As all the way along, you should end up with a commensurate final grade.</p>
<p>This bothers me more than it bothers my son! In fact, it bothers me a lot and is just the kind of thing I used to rail about as a student, grad student, and instructor.</p>