<p>The purpose of the Claremont Consortium was to have a family of colleges where each has its own specialization/focus of study. Because Pomona was the first of the bunch, it’s obviously going to be the most well-rounded (thus creating a greater “liberal-artsy” feel and placing it higher in LAC rankings). Whereas Harvey Mudd has the best undergraduate engineering program in the country, Claremont McKenna is very well-respected among government and business professionals. In finance alone, the two top west coast target schools are Stanford and CMC (yes, NOT Berk. The only real recruiting you’ll get for finance is at HAAS, which is about as different as the farm school at Cornell). I promise this has nothing to do with any sort of college-pride bias. </p>
<p>The two UCs are towards the bottom because of budget cuts and selectivity standards commonly placed upon public institutions.</p>
<p>Caltech’s athletic teams would not stand a chance against our high school teams. Robotics would be another story.<br>
What is the point of this? The Pac-12 already works pretty well for the West.</p>
<p>The real Ivy League is indeed a sports conference, but you are kidding yourself if you think the term or concept of “Ivy League” is nothing more than that league.</p>
<p>To begin with the term Ivy League was in common usage long before the sports conference itself was founded in the 1950s. And to many members of the public, including the apparently OP, the term signifies much more than those eight schools playing various sports against each other. Wiki puts it this way:</p>
<p>“The term Ivy League also has connotations of academic excellence, selectivity in admissions, and social elitism.
The term became official after the formation of the NCAA Division I athletic conference in 1954.[3] The use of the phrase is no longer limited to athletics, and now represents an educational philosophy inherent to the nation’s oldest schools.[4]”</p>
<p>Exactly. And I’m guessing that there are few – very few – posters on cc who have birthdays prior to 1954. So, for this current generation, the Ivy League has always been known as the Ivy League. </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>So they are ignorant. Let’s take the opportunity to educate 'em, huh? :)</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>So we should add in MIT, Swat, Johns Hopkins Northwestern, WashU, Williams, Amherst? Northwestern is D1; Hopkins play D1 in one sport. :D</p>
<p>These schools don’t have enough in common to make sense as a group other than a “highly selective California schools” list. Some are universities with graduate schools, some are undergraduate only LACs. They range in undergraduate enrollment from 1,250-28,700. Why the need to create a list of West Coast Ivies? Prestige envy?</p>
<p>It’s just that… This idea isn’t new. I’m not really seeing the purpose. Do you want to just discuss top west coast schools or do you think a thread on CC can actually form a “West Coast Ivy League”?</p>
<p>I’m just fishing for opinions. Obviously a thread like this will lead to discussions about top west coast schools. Why one is stronger than the other in this area, why the size of this one is better, why this public is better than that private (or vice versa), etc. etc. </p>
<p>Just like any other rankings, some students can actually use this thread as a good starting point to learn about the differences of top west coast schools. In fact, I came across some of the posts you linked while I was conducting my college search and saw plenty of information that was outdated.</p>
<p>Can we please revert back to the original topic now?</p>