Hey, guys. So my WHAP teacher hasn’t given my class enough practice on the essays so I barely understand how to write a DBQ. I grouped and wrote an outline for a practice DBQ found in the Princeton Review (pgs. 76-79). Any help/commentary/advice would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
…
Prompt: Given the documents below, compare and contrast the preambles of several modern constitutions. What other additional document(s) would help give a fuller picture of how the constitutions of these countries compare to the constitutions of other countries?</p>
Thesis: A common trend in world history is that a state’s government is often based upon its prior history and culture, and this can most definitely be seen in a country’s constitution. Often when a state is born in the aftermath of a war, it emphasizes the ideals of peace. When a country is plagued by ethnic genocide or a rigid and stratified social structure, the country sees itself promoting equality. Likewise, when a country’s culture shows a history of liberty, it is reflected into the government. When a country is split and thoroughly divided, the country stands up to promote unity.</p>
Groups: (All Docs are preambles to constitutions)
1- Japan & Germany
2- India & Congo
3- India & France
4- Vietnam & Congo</p>
PoV1: France (Preamble mentions “Rights of Man” and Frech Revolution-tie in on previous culture affecting it)
PoV2: Congo (Tie in to previous ethnic divisions in the country affecting the constitution)
…
I realize I didn’t do a good job “Comparing and contrasting” so could I do something with the groupings I made to somehow make it work?
Also, if you have the PR book and did this, what did u do?</p>