The new version (2016) SAT had changed dramatically from the previous versions, and I know what I think are major difficulties, but I am interested in what students who are currently tackling the SAT are struggling with.
What are you struggling with the most? What would you like a clear explanation or some step by step guidance on?
My R students are struggling with a few things:
- History ("Great Global Conversation," ugh) passages. Some are pre-1800, many are very hard to read, most depart from modern organization conventions (claim->evidence->claim->evidence).
- Inconsistencies in released material. The four "official" released practice tests, for example, do not feature "Except" or "Analogy" question types, but the material on Khan frequently does so.
- The false claim that the test no longer emphasizes advanced vocab. I meet many students who have prepped for the exam without significant vocab study, and when I look at their work, virtually everything they miss in the R section is because of vocab.
Hi,
Thanks for the response. #3 is my pet peeve because who in their right mind would think that having a robust vocabulary wouldn’t be an aspect of the reading test? I have had long conversations with students about marketing and how the test is being marketed to them.
The history is also difficult for my students because they are Canadian/Korean/Chinese students with very little knowledge of American and World History which handicaps them to begin with before they even start to tackle the old-fashioned and formal writing structures.
I agree vocab is still important but not as much as the old exam. You still need strong vocabulary to understand the text. I see many students with weak vocabulary have trouble understanding the passages.
What I recommend is learning the core SAT words. I assume you still have to know vocabulary like adversary, affirmation, explicit, feasible, etc. But I think you no longer need to know what words like semaphore,wanton, zephyr, emollient means.