what are my chances...if it was 1960?

<p>just base on the SAT exam in general.. it is definitely more difficult to score higher on an old SAT exam if you actually seen one yourself</p>

<p>In addition, that statistic research in 1995
only 8% out of the people who take SAT scores higher than 600 on verbal. (1 out of 10)</p>

<p>oppose to year 2000
27% of the people scored above 600 on verbal.. (approx one out of three)
i don think people became that much more intelligent all of a sudden..</p>

<p>if you look at older exams.. you'll realize there are more sections related to analogy and fewer on reading comprehension.. and fewer problems per section within the same given time on newer exams...</p>

<p>that's only the difference between 95 and today..
imagine how much more difficult is the SAT back in the 60s</p>

<p>Wow; great reporting. Especially I want to thank Drusba for his specific accounting of the change in SAT scores due to recentering; the worst thing that could have happened for educational reform in this country. I thought people would laugh when I earlier wrote my brother's 1400 in 1971 resulted in a flood of admissions offers from all over the country; including all of the elites.</p>