@AimingTop50 : I compare the GPA to the rank (which in that applicants case was strong) because it says a lot if the UW GPA (when I say unweighted, I mean unweighted, like nothing on the APs or honors and no A+ addition) is what students call “low” today and they have a high rank from a solid school. It suggests that grading standards are fairly rigorous. I think Emory has more of this going on in matriculates than some places. For example: https://bigfuture.collegeboard.org/college-university-search/emory-university
Interestingly, at a place like VU for example, it appears to more directly correspond (much more distributed between 3.75 and 4.0 yet a similar amount in the top 10): https://bigfuture.collegeboard.org/college-university-search/vanderbilt-university
At 83% are supposedly in the top decile (I actually believe this), but these folks in the top decile are anywhere in between 3.5 and 4.0 unweighted with a substantial amount being between 3.5-3.75. I have always proposed that Emory students tend to tolerate or even enjoy a lot of rigor from some instructors more than students at some comparable schools and perhaps this may be why and it could come from a mixture of things, so perhaps this pattern is good in some ways but in some not as much. Some students may just come from very competitive and tough grading HS’s (STEM outside of engineering is much bigger so maybe more students from STEM magnet high schools or even medical magnets). On the other hand, some may come from less competitive schools (Emory admits a lot more Pell Grant awardees than most elite privates) and thus it may be easier to achieve a top rank without a super high GPA if you don’t come from a strong school. However, I am willing to bet (since “a lot more” still isn’t “a lot” at elite or really any privates) that it is actually more of the former.
But you make good points about how speculating is difficult. The stats I posted above are an example.
I am willing to bet that WUSTL may have a similar pattern despite not posting GPA statistics:
https://bigfuture.collegeboard.org/college-university-search/washington-university-in-st-louis
At Georgia Tech, there is a clear inflation: https://bigfuture.collegeboard.org/college-university-search/georgia-institute-of-technology
As in many students are coming from schools with a much more or over-correspondence (high GPA, less impressive rank). Most students are from Georgia/the south still so I am not surprised (I wonder if Emory’s numbers since the class size is smaller, are more sensitive to what may be the “deflated” vs. class rank GPAs of say, international students from certain countries/ Tech gets a similar amount per year, but a bigger sample is less affected even with the same percent).
UGA sees a clear inflation or is re-weighting GPAs in a strange way…again not a surprise.
https://bigfuture.collegeboard.org/college-university-search/university-of-georgia
Either way, it looks like Emory is weighting “rigor” in its own way that kind of reflects here. Perhaps it has its favorite high schools to recruit from that have an obvious track record (as do other elites, but the ones Emory recruits from may be relatively grade deflated in comparison to others).