What constitutes good EC's vs. "stellar" EC's?

Well, they don’t have to be “unique” per se, nor inherently “interesting” to everyone out there. They must be interesting to the applicant, who will likely get bonus points if s/he can then make him/herself interesting to AOs. Depth, breath, progression, and commitment are what make a good EC into a stellar one, international awards being one way (but not the only way) to show those qualities.

Why do you ask?