<p>On some sites it said it converts to a 2090, but others it says a 1980?</p>
<p>according to [The</a> ACT | Estimated Relationship between ACT Composite Score and SAT CR+M+W Score | ACT](<a href=“http://www.act.org/aap/concordance/estimate.html]The”>http://www.act.org/aap/concordance/estimate.html) , a 30 ACT would be a 2000 on the SAT</p>
<p>oh, and the estimated score range is 1980-2010. But of course, it varies from person to person. Some find themselves to be a lot better on one test than on another. For example, I have a friend of mine who received a 35 on his ACT, but a 2100 on his SAT. According to the chart, someone with a 35 should get around 2290-2370.</p>
<p>The thing is I got a 30 because of science…I did better on reading and math than I did on the SAT. On the SAT I got a 2080 (1350/1600) so I dont know what to send</p>
<p>If your SAT score is in that range, I’d take the ACT. It’s a lot easier to prepare for imo</p>
<p>Well, a 30 ACT puts you in the 95th percentile, while a 2080 SAT is in the 96th percentile. There isn’t much of a difference here, and I doubt any admissions officer will look at a 2080 SAT and 30 ACT and find any significant difference. Why don’t you just send in both?</p>
<p>I’d put a 30 on the ACT in the 2050-2100 range.</p>
<p>@Catria
I’d actually say that a 31 would be in that range</p>
<p>@musiclover
You may just want to send in both, although I personally think the 2080 SAT score is higher than a 30 ACT (Since your SAT score is around the 31 ACT range)</p>
<p>My problem is my scores are really high in everything but science. Science is what brought me to a 30 instead of a 32</p>
<p>2000-2050 then…</p>
<p>2040…</p>