<p>I am a rising senior who has just completed a round of vistits to Ivy League schools and top LACs (Amherst, Columbia, Dartmouth, Harvard, Wesleyan, Williams and Yale). I am interested in rowing in college but I'm not sure whether to do this in a D1 or D3 program. I expect to come to a decison on this in the fall.
Of the schools I visited, I was most underwhelmed with Wesleyan, a place I expected to like. The campus was relatively unattractive, its facilities a bit tattered and the students with whom I spoke were desultory and appeared, for the most part, out of the main stream. The whole environment seemed to me of lesser quality. I asked my Dad how Wesleyan could diverge so much from the other schools despite the differences among them. </p>
<p>He said that a generation ago Wesleyan was on equal footing with Amherst and Williams - the so-called Little Three. Wesleyan, however, did not improve at the same pace as Amherst and Williams, in part because of its more limited finances, and has been overtaken by LACs like Pomona, Swarthmore, Middlebury and Bowdoin in academic quality. He also said the faculty had politicized Wesleyan in the 80s and 90s, veering the school in a leftward direction, a direction that has been difficult for the administration to counter. As a result, Wesleyan has become, over time, a niche school with admission overlaps at Brown, NYU, Vassar, Oberlin and Bard and not with the Ivies and Amherst/Williams. That in fact, Wesleyan is in a different league. </p>
<p>Is this so?</p>