<p>since cornell , or any college, doesnt release average sat scores... what is a noticeably bad score</p>
<p>im horrible at tests, not to make an excuse or anyhting im just saying.
my two SAT II tests are high 600's (670 and 680) in math I and spanish w/ listening... not impressive, but are these at least OKAY or flat out BAD? everyone on here seems to have high 700s, thats why I'm asking.</p>
<p>well.. its not flat out BAD...maybe if you want to be an engineering major..the 670 on math 1c will hurt you.. but..dont think its horribly bad..but just not that good</p>
<p>I have a friend who got accepted with a 580 on writing (he accidentally skipped a page of questions and was too lazy to take the test again). Engineering.</p>
<p>hahah ic :)</p>
<p>you can get accepted with any score, but in its faculty advisor handbook, Cornell states that "scores below 650 are (for Cornell) weak." see <a href="http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=102059%5B/url%5D">http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/showthread.php?t=102059</a> for a rather sidetracked discussion on the matter and a link to the source. However, it merely says "SAT," as opposed to SAT I or SAT II.</p>
<p>well 670 on math IC is a lot better than a 670 on IIC... 670 on IC means about seven - eight questions wrong, which is about an 800 on IIC.</p>
<p>except the questions are more advanced on IIC ;)</p>
<p>I got a 660 on chem and a 690 on math IIC and I'm a bio major...I had some high 700's and an 800 to make up for it, though</p>