<p>tsk tsk Nom, are you just lurking about asserting your superiority numberwise? thankfully, 3 is pretty untouchable. (or is it?) ;) </p>
<p>since sarorah is zen-like in her tranquility she will out-live all of us so that whatever age she finally goes into the great beyond will be teh coolest numbar evAR.</p>
<p>@Blackdream: I concede, what is the pattern? I spent far too long trying to work it out. If your post was not a riddle, I will be, let us say . . . "upset".</p>
<p>F22, US new airsuperiority fighter, eastern equivialent: Su47/Mig1.44
F14, US fleet defense fighter, has phoneix missile with reach up to 143 Miles, eastern equivalent: mig31BM
F15, US air superiority fighter, has a combat record of several hundred to 0 (win/loss). eastern equivalent: mig29, Su27/30/33
F18: US carrier multirole fighter
F16: US ground based multirole fighter, commissioned in the 70's
F4 phantom: nick name "mig killer" during the vietnam war
F104 starfighter: i hate that plane. I posted a thread about it in a sexuality forum, and got pointed out by a GIRL that my F104 pic is wrong in a SEXUALITY forum.</p>
<p>@feuler: Also, if you sum the factorials of each digit, you get 5168. If you split this number into (the prime number) 2 peices, you are left with 51 and 68. And what is the difference between these two numbers? That's right, the prime number 17.</p>
<p>Who are you talking to, Blackdream? I'll indulge you. I prefer the SR71 to all of those. I have had the pleasure of seeing TWO up close (within three feet), one including a mounted drone. Why do I love the military's technology despite hating its uses?</p>