What is the CR and Math curve for March 2010?

<p>I got 650 and 710 in Math. Horrified......</p>

<p>CR seemed extremely harsh.</p>

<p>Math was pretty much the same as January, perhaps a bit harsher.</p>

<p>^agree about CR. I can’t see how it was easy for a harsh curve.</p>

<p>Math was definitely easy and therefore deserved a harsh curve.</p>

<p>CR was harsh: (This curve hasn’t been confirmed yet) An alternate one is 800-800-800-780-750-730</p>

<p>800
800
780
750
730</p>

<p>Math was: (Positive on this one) </p>

<p>800
770
740
710</p>

<p>Math:</p>

<p>800
770
740
720
700
690
680</p>

<p>Positive on this. Sorry Vernacular.</p>

<p>It can’t be. Some people got 710 on the results thread and I’m assuming they didn’t omit any.</p>

<p>Some people also got 720s and 700s.</p>

<p>CR was the hardest in history, atleast when compared to all the released QAS.</p>

<p>Is there any way to figure out the composite writing curve?</p>

<p>80 mc and 8 essay = 760
80 mc and 10 essay = 800</p>

<p>An example scoring chart on collegeboard says 80 mc, 8 essay is 790, yet people are saying this writing curve was lenient…</p>

<p>^
I think they mean that the writing test in general was easier compared to other tests. I would agree mostly due to the easy essay topic and moderate MC. </p>

<p>Another reason may be that you were one of the few people stuck in a bad portion of the curve. The curve may have gotten lenient in the 700-750 range, and since more people get those scores, there are more people claiming that the curve was lenient.</p>

<p>Congratz on your score though - and I do see why you would argue the essay curve(you were so close to perfection)</p>