<p>UCSF is a med school (one of the best in the country) and UC Hastings is a law school. Neither offer undergraduate education.</p>
<p>Stanford and CalTech would be at least equal to or above Berkeley (they're both some of the country's top schools). Problem is, they're twice the cost.</p>
<p>USC's standing largely varies depending on who you ask. Its popularity has skyrocketed within the past several years, so most people on CC would equate it to the top-tier UCs (this is true as far as admissions go). However, if you walk up to any random person and ask them about this it's likely that they'll say it's not that great of a school academically (its name recognition is mostly due to its football team). The thing that most everyone would agree on though is that it's not worth twice the cost of a UC (unless you get a scholarship or something).</p>
<p>The question is how GOOD the UCs are -- and I guess my question would be, uh, good at what?! Good at trying to be more like UCLA, then USC (if we're trying to compare here!) Good at having the best rally committee? Then Cal, for sure! (IMO). Having the best football team? OK, I'll (grudgingly) give U$C that.</p>
<p>Different schools have different programs that exceed. Trying to put the schools as a whole into a rating system is kind of arbitrary.</p>
<p>I was accepted to UCSD last year and went down there an hated it. Now I'm going to UCI because they have a far superior Musical Theater program. But UCI is tecnically listed under UCSD. That's just one example.</p>
<p>This might sound a little biased considering the fact that I'm going to UCI next year, but I think that UCI is climbing up the ranks being such a young institution and whatnot.</p>
<p>Don't JUST go by those rankings when choosing colleges though, because it has to do with what your majoring in, what you want the demographics to be, how your college visits are, and where you want to go to (location of the college). But of course, prestige trumps all (especially with Asian parents). Factors still matter, right? :3</p>
<p>People always seem to look at rankings and acceptance rates when determining how good schools are. It's true that they help to some extent, yet both are superficial without other information. I'd also consider other statistics (such as average GPA/SAT and of course how good it is for your major, which you mentioned). Plus, it's important to consider that USNWR's formula favors some schools over others (basically private schools). Then again, other ranking systems aren't really any better...</p>
<p>Based on strength of academic programs and the numbers of such programs....</p>
<p>Berkeley <--> Stanford
CalTech
UCLA
UCSD
UC Davis
USC
UC Irvine, Santa Barbara
UCSC
UCR
UCM</p>
<p>I agree with others, though, on the difficulty of answering the question because the premise isn't clear. For example, CalTech is more of a niche & would have fewer total number of outstanding academic programs, which I used as the overall criterion. Arts programs I did not account for, and that would through the whole arbitary ranking off.</p>