<p>I'm just looking at the curriculum vitaes for some of the professors that I've had as an undergraduate. Some of them have JDs in addition to "normal" degrees. Now I've always thought that college degrees go like this: associate's degree (but many people skip this level) for two years in a community college, bachelor's degree for four years in a university, and then after that comes the master's, and finally the PhD. Well, where does the JD fit into all of that? If you have a JD, are the master's and PhD not as useful? Or vice versa? What if you have both? One of my professors has this listed as her education:</p>
<p>B.A., Stanford University, 1966
J.D., Yale Law School, 1972
M.A., History, University of Washington, 1991
Ph.D. History, University of Washington, 1995</p>
<p>It looks like she has spent over 30 years all in highly ranked universities, earned four degrees, and still isn't above being an associate professor teaching undergraduate courses (she could also retire soon). Another one of my professor's education:</p>
<p>B.A., University of Colorado, 1990
J.D., American University, 1993
Ph.D., Stanford University, 2002</p>
<p>Looks like she skipped the M.A. She's also an associate professor, so I guess the M.A. doesn't really affect anything? Also, I thought law schools were all about the rankings. American University is apparently barely in the top 50. That's evidently not a major setback, is it? Anyway, in both cases, it seems that the J.D. is something that is above the B.A. but below the Ph.D, is that right? So just because you have a J.D., that doesn't necessarily mean it's the end of the line for you? What benefits are there to earning a Ph.D after one has already earned their J.D.?</p>