<p>Traditional Chinese is annoying too. lol
I don’t know, they just have like too many stuff inside the characters, and their books can be only read from top to bottom, vertically instead of horizontally.
I enjoy classical Chinese alot, but not traditional Chinese.. they are the pain for my eyes.
As Lu Xun said what he saw when he read traditional Chinese: they are monsters laying vertically and horizontally trying to cannibalize the readers. XD</p>
<p>traditional characters look SO much better than the dummied down simplified ones :-P</p>
<p>traditional is so complicated and useless… simplified is better and faster</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>You should learn the Los Angeles dialect of English. They have 1000 words that serve as euphemisms for “cocaine.” </p>
<p>
</p>
<p>…and more easily comprehensible by the uneducated masses. I stay true with traditional.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>do you have proof?</p>
<p>and lol @ the cocaine thing</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I should have said “and designed to be more easily…” I was under the impression that that was the purpose of simplified characters.</p>
<p>How many words are there for marijuana? I’m sure the LA dialect has more words for that than cocaine.</p>
<p>Correct me if I’m wrong, but I think Arabic has two scripts as well. Perhaps one is like our version of cursive though; I don’t know.</p>
<p>that WAS the purpose, easy ;-)</p>
<p>there are too many asians on this forum</p>
<p>there are too many blacks on this forum.</p>
<p>…wth?</p>
<p>^???</p>
<p>I’m just going to guess that MBP meant that your comment was an unfounded generalization, so he used the example in a different context to demonstrate that.</p>
1 Like
<p>aprende espa</p>