<p>Mine is really unbalanced. I got a 24 on the ACT, but a 2050 (1430 CR+M) on the SAT. It's strange, because apparently math people do better on the ACT, but I did much better on the SAT. </p>
<p>How do your scores compare? What do you think explains the differences in your scores?</p>
<p>2120 SAT (700 CR, 690 M, 730 W) and a 33 ACT (34 S, 35 R, 34 E, 29 M)</p>
<p>The science section absolutely makes a difference! Plus a lot of people find the ACT easier- I spent months studying for the SAT and only took a couple practice tests for the ACT the week beforehand, and did a lot better on the ACT. Math will always be my weakness though :)</p>
<p>My daughter, a senior, had a 34 on the ACT and 2270 on the SAT – I think the SAT score equates to a 35 on the ACT so it’s possibly considered a little higher, but she submitted both scores to universities. She had a 36 on the ACT Science and Reading and she intends to major in science, so it seemed appropriate to submit the scores along with SAT.</p>
<p>I got a 2400 on the SAT. I never took an official ACT, but I did take a Kaplan SAT/ACT combo prior to my actual SAT, and they predicted a an overall score of 33 on the ACT for me (31 Science and Reading, 35 English and 36 Math). I always thought the ACT was a lot harder than the SAT, especially the science section (granted, I never did any serious studying for the ACT).</p>