<p>My daughter had difficulty in elementary school, both concentrating and fitting in; I finally homeschooled her in sixth grade, she was so unhappy. We did have her tested for ADHD at the time, but we took her to a psychiatrist who talked with her in a quiet room, without distractions, played checkers with her, and decided she was just very smart, not ADHD. The problem is, she likes checkers, and there was nothing else happening. She returned to public school for middle school, and was immediately at a disadvantage organizationally and staying on task. It wasn’t until I spoke with another mother of an ADHD child, who described his symptoms, that I saw how her child’s problems were so much like mine. Again, this is a kid who could be brilliant enough–in middle school–to overcome the disadvantages of ADHD, but who was terribly frustrated and not doing as well as she could, especially since Middle School is all about organization–that is, many of her grades were dependent on her developing the study skills that would be important to them in high school, and she just didn’t have them. So we tested, this time through the school/questionnaire, and she was clearly ADHD. She’s been on various forms of Ritalin ever since 9th grade, and it’s been a mindsaver for her. It’s not a miracle drug, by any means, but she’s been able to use the very high intelligence she has, without the handicap of ADHD. She’s just finished her first year as a physics major at a highly competitive college; seven of her eight courses were 200-level, some of them without prereqs, and she’s gotten straight As. She only takes the medicine when she needs it; she’s just now learning to drive, for example, and she’s decided she needs it for driving (as an earlier poster noted). </p>
<p>So, for all the people who are ready to dismiss ADHD, and the use of medicine in treating it, I must respond that here is a kid who is now blasting off to a success that I am entirely sure would not have been possible without treatment. Obviously, all kids are different–but that’s the point. I do not generalize from my daughter’s experience; I share it for what it may be worth. Some diabetics, for example, can manage their condition without drugs, and some cannot. Would you take away the latter’s drugs, because the former don’t need them? Some people suffer from depression; for some of them, therapy is helpful. For some of them, medication plus therapy, or simply medication for a short period of time, will do the job, and eventually they will not need either. Some people may need medication for a much longer period. There is no moral advantage in trying to fight a mental condition without the aid of medication that might be helpful, any more than there is in undergoing childbirth without the use of pain relief. Some women, with some deliveries, can; some can’t. What is important is the individual net result, and the quality of care. It does make me angry when people assume that taking medicine equals the lazy way of parenting, indicating that parents of children that take medicine are jumping at the chance to opt out of disciplining and organizing the child; what such persons do not understand is the damage to a child’s self-esteem and to his or her relationship with his or her parents that can result from a continual demand for performance of which he or she is incapable, or from a continual supervision and nagging. If parents and children together can learn methods of coping, that is great–as long as the coping works for them. If it does not, then blaming either party is not helpful. </p>
<p>Good luck to any parents and children dealing with this; it is certainly a challenge.</p>