What would you rate yourself?

<p>For looks probably 6.5
For maturness honestly 9 (( and iam not showing off :stuck_out_tongue: ))</p>

<p>

Posting ratings of your physical attractiveness seems fairly juvenile, no?</p>

<p>All the European exchange students at my school are really weird</p>

<p>And apparently there is in fact a connection between intelligence and beauty (the smarter, the hotter).</p>

<p>A 6/10 for looks? Not many girls notice me though lol.</p>

<p>An 8/10 for intellectuality :)</p>

<p>

I donā€™t knowā€¦ Sounds like something social outcast ā€œgeniusesā€ tell themselves at night. Is there any source here?</p>

<p>@wolverine: In my experience, itā€™s intelligence * attractiveness = some constant, and as intelligence goes up, attractiveness goes down. Inverse relationship. Lol</p>

<p>Although, Dawkins argues that humanity has evolved to become overall more attractive and intelligent through the ages, so yes, I do believe they have a tendency to converge.</p>

<p>Iā€™ve heard there have actually been studies, and the more attractive people are smart. From my own experience, I think this is the case. Whoā€™s prettier: Jessica Simpson or Natalie Portman? Iā€™d say Natalie Portman, no doubt. Think about the uneducated people you knowā€¦are they very attractive?</p>

<p>

You have heardā€¦ that there have been ā€œstudies.ā€ Howā€¦ scientific.</p>

<p>

  1. Subjective. 2. One example does not a study make.</p>

<p>

I know attractive people who are both rather smart and not, in my opinion. I also know unattractive people who are both rather smart and not, in my opinion.</p>

<p>^^ Actually, in my school, yes. </p>

<p>Although there are several intelligent kids who are attractive too.</p>

<p>Okay, please donā€™t hesitate to dispute every single thing I say.</p>

<p>Paris Hilton or Amanda Peet?</p>

<p>

Well, when you make disagreeable comments based on some ā€œstudiesā€ you have heard about, donā€™t expect total belief.</p>

<p>

Celebrity examples do not make a study. Come on.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Well actually, I think Portmanā€™s much more attractive too. But thatā€™s another story.</p>

<p>On a side note, did anyone know that Lady Gaga and Childish Gambino both went to NYU?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Thatā€™s not fair. When I see Hiltonā€™s face Iā€™m already biased because it screams stupid.</p>

<p>

I only knew of the existence of one of them, so no, not likely.</p>

<p>Lindsay Lohan or Kate Middleton?</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>I figured that Childish Gambino was a bad example. Iā€™m listening to too much of his music, lol -_- (Heā€™s the guy from Community, if by any minute chance you were wondering) But yeah, I was taken back when I saw that Lady Gaga went to NYU. Mind you, for Tisch, but still.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>What is this, a whoā€™s hotter thread?</p>

<p>Again, see Hilton, but for Lohan this time.</p>

<p>Ya just proved my point Tenors. Stupidity itself does not help make a person attractive.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>But thatā€™s because when I see their faces, I associate them with the outrageous things theyā€™ve done that the media covers 24/7. No one in the world can look at Lohan without eventually thinking about her lifestyle. Same with Hilton. This doesnā€™t apply nearly as much to people in my school though.</p>

<p>Also, for some reason every time I see Kate Middleton I think ā€œgold diggerā€. I really, really do not know why.</p>

<p>Wolverine, I think youā€™ve caught the stupid.</p>

<p>

Nor does intelligence. Mental faculties and physical attractiveness are based on separate criteria. No one here is claiming stupid people are more attractive, youā€™re just saying theyā€™re less physically attractive, citing imaginary ā€œstudiesā€ and a few celebrity examples.</p>

<p>Okay, letā€™s un-derail this topic, shall we?</p>

<p>On a scale of 1-10, where</p>

<p>For men, 1 = Gilbert Gottfried and 10 = Jesus Luz (Maddonaā€™s recent ex)</p>

<p>For women, 1 = Rosie Oā€™Donnell and 10 = Kate Beckinsale</p>

<p>Where does CC rank?</p>