<p>Can you guys list these universities in order from the most competitive to least to get accepted </p>
<p>USC, UCLA or UCB</p>
<p>Can you guys list these universities in order from the most competitive to least to get accepted </p>
<p>USC, UCLA or UCB</p>
<p>UCB
UCLA
USC</p>
<p>UCLA and USC are both rated at 27% on college board for acceptance rate, however, UCLA has significantly more applicants.</p>
<p>UCB, UCLA, USC</p>
<p>I'm basing this off of anecdotal evidence.</p>
<p>UCLA, UCB, USC</p>
<p>I'm basing this off anecdotal evidence.</p>
<p>based on Collegeboard, UCLA is 27% and UCB is 26%......... but i dont know how accurate collegeboard is. Also, 27 and 26 is not a noticble difference. </p>
<p>I think that UCB and UCLA view their admissions process differently, they each are looking for quite different things in applicants and that shows in the student body. This i am just basing off of what i noticed.</p>
<p>regardless of which schools are most difficult to get into, i think that students from all three schools are well qualified. i would put those three schools in the same upper tier of elite universities, just below cal tech and stanford.</p>
<p>in rank of prestige it would be UCB, UCLA, USC...but they're all pretty prestigous if you ask me.</p>
<p>I don't think acceptance rate is a wholly accurate measure considering that the applicant pool is not the same for every school.</p>
<p>USC is not as easy to get into as people think.</p>
<p>I dunno... I think USC is pretty easy. I got in as an architecture major, and my portfolio was last minute and looked like crap. If I had submitted the same thing to UCLA as an art major, it would've definitely gotten rejected on the spot without consideration.</p>
<p>What's weird, is that I have a friend who got accepted to UCLA and UCB, but got rejected from USC. Me on the other hand, got accepted to UCLA and USC but got rejected from UCB.</p>
<p>[ol]
[<em>]UCB
[</em>]UCLA
[li]USC[/li][/ol]</p>
<p>I agree, BoelterHall. USC is more competitive than most ppl think...</p>