<p>33 vs 2020</p>
<p>Sat: 2230
Act: 35</p>
<p>Very nice scores, phantasmagorical ;)</p>
<p>ACT: 33
SAT: 1890</p>
<p>funny thing was I felt great after taking the SAT and was confident that I was easily over 2000, yet on my ACT I was worried that I was only going to get around a 30-31.</p>
<p>2150 vs 32</p>
<p>ACT:
Composite:32
English:31
Math:30
Science:30
Reading:36</p>
<p>SAT:1940
Critical Reading:640
Math:680
Writing:620</p>
<p>2130 vs. 33</p>
<p>ACT-34
E-34/M-35/R-33/S-32
SAT-2030
M-760/CR-690/W-580</p>
<p>I'm very happy about my ACT :)</p>
<p>2070 vs. 35</p>
<p>though like some other people, i'm getting my june sat scores tomorrow.</p>
<p>2140 vs 32
april june
680cr 34 34
690m 34 34
760w 33 32
28 29</p>
<p>Is 32 competitive for some ivy and top tier LACs?</p>
<p>giggles - i believe that for most of the ivies it is in the middle 50% range. but the top of the range none the less.</p>
<p>1390/2030 vs 32</p>
<p>Which has the edge, if either?</p>
<p>Edit: Forgot to put the subscores lol
SAT:
M:740
CR:650
W:650</p>
<p>ACT:
E:33
M:33
R:34
S:29</p>
<p>cluck09, 32 is better.</p>
<p>Thanks, I wasn't really sure how they correlated =)</p>
<p>is there a reason all ccers have higher ACT scores..</p>
<p>all CCers posting here..</p>
<p>Act>/= Sat</p>
<p>34 vs. 2200</p>
<p>I feel like the 2200 looks better, though. Correct me if I'm wrong, that might just be my East Coast bias. I'll still submit the ACT, though!</p>
<p>2360 vs. 36</p>
<p>Close enough to be the same for me at least :)</p>
<p>34 looks better than 2200 ! its about 2260
so about the same lol</p>
<p>SAT: 1420 / 2120</p>
<p>ACT: 34</p>
<hr>
<p>Breakdown:
SAT:
M: 720
CR: 700
W: 700</p>
<p>ACT:
E: 36
M: 33
R: 34
S: 34</p>