<p>1820 vs 30</p>
<p>definite improvement, i think. hopefully i can get 32+</p>
<p>SAT:1490 or 2180
ACT: 32</p>
<p>can someone tell me which one is more impressive</p>
<p>SAT-ACT</a> Conversion chart</p>
<p>^ACT/SAT Score Conversion Charts</p>
<p>use this website</p>
<p>i got a 2030&33</p>
<p>SAT: 1910
ACT: 29 </p>
<p>seem to be pretty equal.</p>
<p>2200 vs 36</p>
<p>1850 vs 33. lol. </p>
<p>ACT: First time 31, Second time 32, 33 superscore
SAT: 1990</p>
<p>I took the SAT first time in October. I felt like I had so much extra time with the SAT’s testing structure, but it seems the SAT is trying to trick you so much more often. ACT is more time-intensive and, while having a harder math section, is more concrete. At least, that’s the impression I got. </p>
<p>ACT: 32 vs. 2060</p>
<p>I’m an anomaly! 2290 (770M 790cr 730w)
34 (33E 34M 34R 34S)</p>
<p>ACT: 32
SAT: 1800 </p>
<p>Pretty big difference—roughly 300 points if I look at a concordance table.</p>
<p>ACT: 33
SAT: 1970 (HA!)</p>
<p>I hate both tests, honestly.</p>
<p>ACT: 32
SAT: 1910, attempted a long time ago though :(</p>
<p>2030 vs. 34</p>
<p>2000 vs 32 (first time)
2060 vs 34 (second time)</p>
<p>SAT: 1840/1290
ACT: 34
Definitely prefer the ACT</p>
<p>SAT: 1910
ACT: 32 (as of right now…still waiting on October scores)</p>
<p>The biggest advice I could give an underclassman is to try the ACT before you devote any significant amount of time towards the SAT. I only took the SAT once and got a 1910 with a lot of time and effort put in to raise my 197 PSAT score, compared to 3 or so practice tests and some reading of the Red book for a 32. It’s multitudes better.</p>
<p>SAT: 2310
ACT: 35 (141)</p>
<p>SAT -
Math 800
Reading 730
Writing 790</p>
<p>ACT -
34 composite</p>
<p>Any advice on which one i should sent to colleges? I’m leaning towards my SAT tbh</p>
<p>2110 vs 36. I took the SAT a long time ago and liked the ACT much more. </p>
<p>2320 vs 35</p>