<p>Yeah, it’s mixed up. I got deferred SCEA but managed to get my e-mail at 7:07 pm.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I’m not being mean. The SCEA rejection letter is scattered throughout the board. And you’re probably a ■■■■■, because 2400/35 are frequently rejected by Stanford. </p>
<p>And yes, I don’t have the 2400/35. Hence, I’m an idiot.</p>
<p>wait stanford2013 you said you got a 37 ACT in that other thread! Are you lying or something??</p>
<p>Get a screenshot of the email (with date) and just paint over your name. Upload it and post the link so we believe you.</p>
<p>^ Stanford2013 is obviously a ■■■■■. Don’t bother…</p>
<p>Stop showing reactions!! lol That guy’s obviously enjoying messing with our minds.</p>
<p>I like how the posters of the whole forum are online.</p>
<p>fine! just give me a goddamn second to black my name out. screenshots will be posted.</p>
<p>inb4 “pics or it didnt happen”</p>
<p>lol stanford2013. Simply the fact that you referenced your SAT score shows how unqualified of a candidate you really are. Stanford doesn’t really give any weight to 2400s. I should know, I have one. 
Maybe this is just a joke, but seriously, it’s not funny.</p>
<p>Guys what if Stanford2013 is an admission officer from Stanford toying with us? </p>
<p>(Scary thought)</p>
<p>he’s a bored senior waiting for the email telling him that he got rejected from stanford.</p>
<p>^^Then I doubt his username would be “stanford2013”.</p>
<p>yeah and big brothers watchin us</p>
<p>right cause the fact that ONLY he got it and NOBODY else did is not suspicious at all…</p>
<p>alright. i can see i’m causing some of you hardship. i didn’t get an e-mail.</p>
<p>^^hahahaha, who would have “thunk” it?</p>
<p>Hahahaha^</p>
<p>sucker.</p>
<p>you’re a bad ■■■■■.</p>
<p>the last thing i want is for someone to actually get upset. a ■■■■■ i am, an a$$hole I am not.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Ok. Stanford. Are you guys ready to release yet? </p>
<p>Seriously, hardship is an understatement. We like died several times already today.</p>