<p>
[quote]
<em>sigh</em> four light hearted, non-serious sentences and
[/quote]
</p>
<p>I guess you answered my question...</p>
<p>
[quote]
Do you find enjoyment in posting silly things?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>
[quote]
it means thorough competence in a field or skill.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>...and thorough competence means reaching one's full potential? That is utter nonsense. Some person's best just is not good enough. One cannot say that by him utilizing his full potential, he is somehow proficient for the LSAT or the field of law in general.</p>
<p>Sorry, what I just posted seems so self-evident; I am wondering why I must explain it. Some people are just not good enough. One should not lower the standard of "expert" and "proficient" to the maximum potential of every individual; standards exist for a reason. They are meant to be (supposedly) objective means with which to measure the aptitude of a person for a given discipline. You do not pat someone on the back when he scores a 145 on the LSAT and still utilizes his full potential; you say "sorry, perhaps you are not cut out for the field."</p>
<p>
[quote]
because I'm really tired of responding.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Sayonara.</p>