<p>It’s pretty hard to find good information about young technologies because asking about how well they will pan out is a tough question to answer. Journal papers written by the guys who know the most about it are very technical and don’t address these questions because of the audience, or dodge these questions because the authors don’t know the answers themselves. </p>
<p>Popular science reporting on these things often gets things wrong and exaggerates the importance of these technologies. For example, when Intel succeeded on making an optical transmitter and receiver pair, tech articles were reporting on ‘a photonic processor’. </p>
<p>All that that system does is take a bunch of digital electrical signals, encodes the information of these electrical signals onto various colors of light, couples the light to an optical fiber, and on the other end of the fiber, decodes the lightwave into the old electrical signals. It’s just a wire. Sure, it is a very good wire in that it can carry a lot of information, but it certainly isn’t anything approaching a microprocessor.</p>