<p>^^ I didn’t say it’s due to the school or students’ “poor performance”. I think it’s due to the fact that SAT alone isn’t a brilliant indicator of one’s academic success. If SAT alone is a perfect indicator, then why didn’t the best schools make it as a single criterion in choosing students? For example, Harvard, said to be the most selective school in the USA, could just ask all its applicants their SAT scores and rank them according to the HIGHEST scores submitted. Harvard can easily do that, right? But Harvard didn’t do that. Why? </p>