<p>
</p>
<p>I got sucked in, so I might as well do an analysis:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>Legitimately, what % of Princeton men married ‘beautiful women’? Say, California (Arizona) standards? 33%?</p></li>
<li><p>What % of legacies at Princeton? 10%?</p></li>
<li><p>Since “beautiful” is probably meant for women, what’s the breakdown of Princeton legacies being female v male? Let’s say 50% female.</p></li>
<li><p>Not to mention, what an unattractive guy would do towards producing kids with the “beautiful” gene. I’m thinking Billy Joel and Christy Brinkley (who apparently attended UCLA for a short while.) The kids I think look more like Billy Joel, which seems likely, since he seems to have more of the dominant genes: dark hair, darker complexion, etc. I don’t recall if the daugther who was in pursuit of a music career was unattractive. I don’t think she was, but she didn’t look like CB minus age. </p></li>
</ul>
<p>So what do the prior three represent wrt Princeton’s beautiful legacy coeds?</p>
<p>~ 1.6-1.7%?</p>
<p>That’s a bit of a stretch, lol. I can’t believe I wasted 10 minutes on this…</p>