<p>I'm looking at Wisconsin, Richmond, Maryland, Penn State, Wake, Carnegie, the UC's (don't have finance I know) and NYU's Stern. I'm '07, 32 ACT, decent GPA, lots of sports, could get into most, but how are they in terms of their finance programs and economics (planning a double major possibly), as well as post grad opps. Any feedback would be appreciated, thanks alot.</p>
<p>Cal and Riverside are the only two UC's with undergrad business programs. UCLA has an excellent biz-econ program. Of course, Cal and UCLA grads are highly regarded; note, however, that admission to those programs is not automatic as a matriculating Frosh since you need to transfer in later.</p>
<p>btw: The short answer to your post is Wharton, Wharton, Wharton.</p>
<p>I'm well aware of Wharton's financial prestige and overall it would be my top choice school, but a 32 ACT and Sat's that won't break 2200 won't get me in, thanks for the UC stuff, I'm out of state there though unfortunately.</p>
<p>I would definitely go to Stern for finance. I believe its #2 in the nation.</p>
<p>And Stern offers great internship opportunities, due to its location</p>
<p>Short Answer: Stern or Carnegie.
Long Answer: Carnegie rivals Stern in reputation and rank. Stern is tied 5 for undergrad business, and Stern beats Carnegie in finance (Stern #2, Carnegie #5). Wharton would be better but I doubt you can get in unless you're like a URM from the streets of the South Bronx or LA with no father and a mother who's a cocaine addict, unemployed, homeless, and young enough to be your sister, and were ranked 1st in your class.</p>
<p>...not that there's anything WRONG with that.</p>
<p>Wisconsin is a strong business school. Very nice facilities as well.</p>