<p>Which one? I have a problem considering that I found PR pretty hard and got a 48/70, while I found Barron's relatively easy and got a 63/70. I have a feeling that the PR is more like it since it has all the broad trends even more than Barron's, but maybe not.</p>
<p>My scores:</p>
<p>Barron's: 67/70
Princeton's: 52/70
Kaplan's: (high) 60-something, don't remember.
Peterson's: 41/70 (*.)
**2002 Real Test: 64/70</p>
<p>Conclusion: Barron's is more accurate?</p>
<p>Not Princeton Review. I was convinced I wasn't going to get a 5 because I was getting low marks on its practice tests, but when the real thing rolled around I rolled right in with a 5.</p>
<p>Thank God - PR is REALLY hard.</p>
<p>I think the same thing happened to me on Bio M SAT II. On Sparknotes I was getting 700s. PR gave me 600s, and I got an 800 on the real thing.</p>
<p>That's strange though, because I thought that Barron's is generally harder.</p>