<p>kwaldner - please provide a reference that the Gourman Report was updated in 2008. As far as I can see, it was published in 1993 with the last update in 1997. It is very heavily critisized as having very poor methodology, as much as anyone can tell since it was largely unexplained. The Gourman report is essentially worthless except as a list of schools. But then any undergraduate ranking system is essentially worthless.</p>
<p>
Well duh. Could you say something any more obvious? But how would you rate the OP’s chances for those schools with a 2010 SAT? Not very good I would think.</p>