<p>well i know you still have to be academically capable for elite colleges, but which ones look more for character? such as musicians, poets, leaders, community 'servicers' and stuff.. sorry for the vagueness of the question <:)</p>
<p>edit: example: im thinking since the UC system is public, UCLA and UCB would be more obliged to picking out students with more academic merit more than anything</p>
<p>Claremont Mckenna. You can literally write your way in, and they definitely look for leadership in their applicants, not to the point of overlooking bad grades but strong leadership will defnitely give you a leg up.</p>
<p>I disagree w/Bly. GPA and rigorous schedule are by far the most important factor in ultra selective schools' admissions criteria. Therefore, one would have to be extremely unique (tops in the nation?) to overcome a mediocre academic record. Certainly "character" is valued but these top tier schools have many applicants of proven "character" PLUS the academic achievement. Therefore they have the luxury of holistically admitting students. Best of luck to you</p>
<p>I would agree with Red_Shirt to some extent because Claremont McKenna really looks at fit and it seems there are regularly people who are accepted by CMC and rejected by Stanford, Pomona or vice versa.</p>
<p>Any college that touts a strong honor code will probably look carefully at character (Davidson, Haverford). Carleton, however, will look at whether you are a character.</p>
<p>fireflyscout, as a Carleton parent and alum, I can safely say that you win the prize for effectively describing Carleton in a single, pithy statement.</p>