<p>“i sense some response and nonresponse bias (and a non srs sample”
-Hunterbender</p>
<p>Quoted for truth.</p>
<p>“i sense some response and nonresponse bias (and a non srs sample”
-Hunterbender</p>
<p>Quoted for truth.</p>
<p>@Baka: Haha, omg AP stats ruined my life. Everytime i look at some study, a little voice inside my head says “but was it an SRS?” or “but what is the confidence level/margin of error?”</p>
<p>I got into both.</p>
<p>accepted by both from norcal.</p>
<p>Both bruins and bears</p>
<p>rejected both. along with everyone else in my school… except one who got into 1/2… ucla.</p>
<p>were canadians though.</p>
<p>Both.
About ten of my friends got into UCLA.
Only one other to Cal.</p>
<p>I got into both! :D</p>
<p>both 10char</p>
<p>both. berkeley spring admit.</p>
<p>I got accepted to both. I did have friends denied at UCLA and accepted at Cal and vice versa, so I agree - no correlation between the two.</p>
<p>Rejected from both with a 4.12 gpa, 2100 sat, and good ecs…</p>
<p>accepted both</p>
<p>Yeah I’m glad someone is finally doing this because I’m totally confused. Denied UCLA international relations. Accepted Cal Middle East studies. It might be because of the major but they say its not taken into consideration for arts and sciences. Oh - and there are some other variables. I’m homeschooled and my mom was a graduate at CAL (though I don’t think alumni relations are supposed to matter). <strong>sigh</strong> long day! this admissions process is very random. The thing I have learned: its not that you were not qualified. The reader just didn’t like you.</p>
<p>Accepted at both.</p>
<p>accepted at both, as were at least 5 others in my class</p>
<p>admit both :)</p>
<p>in ucla,
reject ucb.</p>
<p>In for both of them</p>
<p>Accepted at both.</p>