<p>^ that's really interesting. Could you get me a link?</p>
<p>edit: nvm i found it</p>
<p><a href="http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/hoxby/papers/revealedprefranking.pdf%5B/url%5D">http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/hoxby/papers/revealedprefranking.pdf</a></p>
<p>seems like harvard is least affected as scores go up. Pton and yale evidently both practice "strategic admissions" so they actually dip down, then spike. MIT just increases slowly exponentially</p>
<p>
[quote]
athlete is not a hook it is a talent....but what u ppl here refer to is a "black athlete" most commonly......going along with the URM and georgraphically disadvantaged thing....</p>
<p>it is nothing but jealousy pure jealousy.... if u read my thread, even an interviewer for ivies posted on there. and read his past threads as well.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>You write English not to good.</p>
<p>Don't you mean:</p>
<p>You write English not TOO good? haahahha or is that still grammatically flawed? :P</p>
<p>"athlete is not a hook it is a talent....but what u ppl here refer to is a "black athlete" most commonly......going along with the URM and georgraphically disadvantaged thing...."</p>
<p>No, it's a hook. You're not the one defining the meaning of words. In college admissions, being a recruited athlete is called a hook. And no, you're wrong again. We don't commonly think of the black athlete. Most recruited athletes at Ivies are white, do your research before posting BS.</p>
<p>VV, before they give you your New Yorker license, you are first required to learn the arts of sarcasm and irony.</p>
<p>C02 is merely a case of an advanced stage of the affliction.</p>
<p>Haha, Denzera I thought I was being sarcastic and ironic too :(</p>
<p>It’s a little low, but it’s not like it’s an automatic no.</p>
<p>heh that rhymed.</p>
<p>I got in with a 2010. My theory is that Columbia doesn’t put a whole lot of emphasis on your SAT score if the rest of your application is stellar.</p>
<p>I got in with a 2100 superscore.
It happens.</p>
<p>Yeah, admittance with sub-2100 scores happens. Not super-frequent, but it definitely happens, and not just to URMs & athletes.</p>
<p>Ah yes, the classic “reply to a thread that’s 3 years old and pick up like nothing’s happened.”</p>
<p>i know two people who in the class of 2014 with a sub-2000 SAT score.
one of them even had a sub-1900 score</p>
<p>i got in with a score of 2000… Im an international student btw</p>