@VeryLuckyParent wrote
College adcomms are not bounty-hunters like subprime mortgage brokers who profit by the head. While adcomms may not have to read the term papers of the students they admit, the adcomms certainly do have a vested interest in the quality of the students they admit, as colleges get tracked on their 4-yr or 6-yr graduation rate, along with other student body quality measures.
Unlike subprime lenders, colleges cannot profit from rebundling and selling their underperforming students to other schools. There’s only a down-side for colleges to admit incapable students: erosion of of revenue & erosion of reputation.
Also, your idea has a serious manpower flaw. College admissions work and bank lending ard FULL time jobs. Dunno how you think professors have time to read thousands of applications during the height of the school year.
And **what makes you think the Adcomns decide on what the institutional priorities of the school are? **That’s for the college’s President and Board of Directors to decide. The Admissions Office only executes the targets set by the leadership. Even if the chore got reassigned to faculty, the faculty would still be directed to achieve the same institutional goals.