I only made it through half the article because I thought it was unintelligible. It made it sound like students were being prevented from peacefully demonstrating against speakers they didn’t agree with, when the reality is a relatively small number of students (and non-student agitators) are willing to do anything from disrupting campus operations to using violence to prevent speakers they don’t like from speaking.
If school administrators are complicit in anything, it’s that they cave in too easily to the threats.