<p>After much deliberation and thinking, I was finally ready to send in my SIR to Hopkins over UPenn. And then I happened to stumble the Princeton Review's site of "The Best 368 Colleges" and immediately pulled back. </p>
<p>Hopkins was ranked #6 as the school where "Professors get Low Marks" and had a very low quality of life rating of only 68/100 (I even cross-checked the 2009 version with the 2008 version of PR's guide and it was also a 68/100). Why is this? I thought the school prided itself as a place where professors genuinely care about students are willing to help them excel in the classroom. To me, these two disturbing factoids are reaffirming the rumors that Hopkins is a cutthroat and student-unfriendly place. </p>
<p>UPenn's rankings on the other hand do not reflect any major qualms within its student body. It received a quality of life rating of 88/100 (up from 75/100 in the 2008 PR Guide) and was listed as a "College with a Conscious". The only negative rating was that its "Town/Gown" relationship was strained. </p>
<p>I was honestly very disappointed when I came across these ratings. The Princeton Review, in my eyes, is a reputable source, making it hard for me to shift aside these low marks. Can anyone shed light on why Hopkins is receiving such low marks in these two critical areas? I would greatly appreciate any input.</p>