<p>1)UCLAs a public school, 2)add holistics in admissions which in combination -> some from a lower profile get in.</p>
<p>At good to excellent high schools UCLA matriculants will have higher gpa/SATs than USC matriculants, as shown by this database of [PV Peninsula](<a href=“http://www.pvpusd.k12.ca.us/penhi/collegeacceptance/collegeacceptance2010.pdf”>http://www.pvpusd.k12.ca.us/penhi/collegeacceptance/collegeacceptance2010.pdf</a>) and another here [url=<a href=“http://www.pvhigh.com/CCC/pdf/CCC_Student_Profile_2010.pdf]PVHS[/url”>http://www.pvhigh.com/CCC/pdf/CCC_Student_Profile_2010.pdf]PVHS[/url</a>]. </p>
<p>But UCLA takes more from under-performing high schools, ones USC wouldnt touch, so this brings down the stats of UCLA (again, UCLA is public). </p>
<p>Add that USC superscores. </p>
<p>Wrt UCLA v Cal, UCLA has a larger geographical burden of u-p high schools in SoCal than Cal in NorCal.</p>