<p>The obvious response of course, is that Berkeley does not use race in admissions, and therefore admits more Asians because:</p>
<ol>
<li>There are more Asians %-wise in CA than in most states.</li>
<li>Asians tend to perform better on standarized testing.</li>
</ol>
<p>But let's take it a few steps further. I looked up a few figures on collegeboard.com:</p>
<p>Berkeley:</p>
<p><1% American Indian/Alaskan Native
*46% Asian/Pacific Islander *
4% Black/Non-Hispanic
12% Hispanic
29% White/Non-Hispanic
2% Non-Resident Alien
7% Race/ethnicity unreported </p>
<p>I looked up a few other top colleges:</p>
<p>Princeton:</p>
<p>1% American Indian/Alaskan Native
13% Asian/Pacific Islander
10% Black/Non-Hispanic
7% Hispanic
*60% White/Non-Hispanic *
9% Non-Resident Alien </p>
<p>Yale:</p>
<p>1% American Indian/Alaskan Native
12% Asian/Pacific Islander
9% Black/Non-Hispanic
8% Hispanic
*49% White/Non-Hispanic *
9% Non-Resident Alien
13% Race/ethnicity unreported </p>
<p>Williams</p>
<p><1% American Indian/Alaskan Native
11% Asian/Pacific Islander
10% Black/Non-Hispanic
8% Hispanic
*64% White/Non-Hispanic *
7% Non-Resident Alien </p>
<p>All of them have a larger plurality of Caucasians than the Asian population (percentage-wise) at Berkeley. And these are elite colleges that do use race in admissions, and actually try to build an ethnic diverse campus. There are many colleges where the white population is even more overwhelming (Wake Forest has 82%, for example). The counterargument might be that this should be expected from the large Caucasian population in this country, but it still doesn't address the point that most college campuses in the US are actually less diverse than Berkeley racially, if we were to base it on the percentage of the largest ethnic group (which is what the title of this thread suggests).</p>
<p>My other point is, ironically, something you have already addressed. Diversity is one of those "loaded words" where almost everyone sees as a good thing. But as you have mentioned, Asians tend to hang around with Asians, Caucasians with Caucasians, and so on. It seems to me like most students don't really want diversity. They'd rather hang out with people of similar ethnicity, and why not? Similar culture, similar interests, similar upbringings, similar values. How much value can diversity bring to our education? Sure, if the university offers an African American Studies class, and the room is filled with only Asians, well there's an example of where lack of diversity hurts the class. But the vast majority of the classes offered at universities are not race-related. So how does "varying perspectives from different ethnicities" come into play when we're talking about say, a math class? A chemistry class? Is there some different way of solving a problem that only Hispanic students can come up with, for instance? That seems pretty silly. While diversity is good, we have to think of opportunity costs. By bringing more diversity to a campus, you are also giving up admitting better-performing students. At some point, the costs outweigh the benefits.</p>
<p>Finally, I'll end by saying I believe that the main factor in admissions to a top university should be based on excellence in performance and achievements, not racial background.</p>