because there’s not a whole lot of other [popular] rankings.
public schools are at a disadvantage because the professor/student ratio is low, alumni giving % is low, SAT scores aren’t super-scored, a higher number and % of students drop out, etc…</p>
<p>if anything, pay attention to the peer assessments :P</p>
<p>I just revised my ranking. Berkeley moved down a few places due to the inclusion of WSJ data, but it still is in the top 10, tied with Caltech and Dartmouth at #9. </p>
<p>Here’s the criteria:</p>
<p>30% - School Prestige
*10% - Ranking of the Best Colleges (National Colleges Ranking)
*10% - Peer Assessment Score
*10% - Best Colleges: High School Counselor Rankings of National Universities</p>
<p>you shouldnt include the rankings of WSJ because only a select group of post-undergraduate institutions were chosen and not necessarily the highest ranking institutions</p>
<p>^ I agree with you mikecerang 101%. However, i did it upon the insistent of some CC members who were from private schools. WSJ is one of the most ridiculous ranking I’ve seen in my entire life.</p>
<p>1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology<br>
2 Harvard University **<br>
3 Stanford University<br>
4 University of California Berkeley<br>
5 Cornell University<br>
6 University of Wisconsin Madison<br>
7 University of Minnesota<br>
8 California Institute of Technology **<br>
9 University of Illinois Urbana Champaign *<br>
10 University of Michigan </p>
<p>My Sat scores for jan are 1800’s (i was very sick that day)
And my scores for oct are almost 2200’s</p>
<p>I also have good sat2 scores(700’s) and bad ones (500’s)</p>
<p>Schools like UPenn and Cornell requires that i send all of my scores</p>
<p>But do i really need to send all of them? </p>
<p>I know it says that i send all of my scores but on the website i can still uncheck the scores that i don’t want to send.</p>
<p>Is there anyone who didn’t send all of their scores when they were told to send all?
If so, were there any consequences? Did you see receive admittance?</p>
<p>In response to the question asked: why would Berkeley be ranked high based on any system that discusses the undergraduate experience in general? Berkeley’s a world-class place for academics, but I’m sure for serving the needs of a massive group of people wanting to get educated, aside from being relatively cheap (even with the budget issues), I’m not sure it caters to most people’s needs as well as many other places may.</p>
<p>UCSD’s the better choice for some areas of Biotech, though that’s more because it’s in SD than because of the strength of the program. UCLA’s better premed, though that’s something you see at most schools with good med programs. And so forth.</p>
<p>Berkeley’s still the better choice for most purposes, though.</p>
<p>Berkeley graduates more PHD’s than 95% of all colleges. They have several top programs, but consistently rank in top 10 programs across the board. They are not ranked in the top 20 overall because the amount of money they are raking in has gone down in trajectory. They simply don’t get as much money from donations as ivies, and only 30% from the state (and decreasing). Academically, they are equal to any top 10 school aside from Harvard, Yale, Princeton, and your technical schools like MIT and Cal tech. Besides, it’s the best public university in the world by far.</p>
<p>I use to care about rankings, but since actually transferring here, I could really care less. Then again, I tend to avoid social circles where academic elitism pervades.</p>