<p>in the princteon review top 300 something schools, why isn't uci there? uci is like 44th in us news basicall y tied with davis and santa barabara. even riverside and sc made the list, why not uci?</p>
<p>Princeton Review has a horrible selection of schools to choose from.</p>
<p>Yeah...</p>
<p>If UCI isn't even in the 300, let alone 200, or even 100, then I'm not to sure I'd trust that review.</p>
<p>I personally looked into this matter in 2006. According to a representative from the Princeton Review, UCI was not placed in their Top 366 "Review" simply because a representative from the university did not resubmit a questionnaire sent out by Princeton Review. Apparently, this same representative did not subit the 2007 questionnaire either. If you ask me, UCI should be placed in the top 25 Universities..</p>
<p>But just look at the PR schools though. I love the idea of a small college, but when that book is saturated with small colleges and low tier state schools (ie. Riverside would look better), you have to doubt the wisdom of the list.</p>
<p>Well, so much for the Princeton Review!</p>