<p>Oh dear, where to begin… syntax errors or flawed logic …</p>
<p>Syntax is easier, so I’ll start there:</p>
<p>"Why not to bother with low-medium tier public school ->(SCHOOLS) if your -> (YOU’RE) OOS</p>
<hr>
<p>Applying to low-medium tier public colleges are -> (IS) of bad taste -> (IDEA) if you are OOS, because of the cost and quality of education. You have to pay $35,000 for the same quality of education another student gets for $15,000 (OOS and In-state student). Meanwhile if you went -> (WERE TO GO) to a private/top tier public school you would get a good education for a meaningful -> (REASONABLE) price, if not cheaper also -> (A CHEAPER ONE).</p>
<p>I think this is common knowledge, but I just wanted -> (WANT) to say it anyway </p>
<p>Now, to the logic:</p>
<ul>
<li><p>some lower ranked schools offer a superior education to an undergraduate student. A student needs to sense a fit with the school. Some lower ranked schools have a much lower student/faculty ratio that some higher ranked. Some lower ranked schools offer a choice of major not offered at a higher ranked school. The list goes on.</p></li>
<li><p>as noted by a poster above, some out of state OOS Publics can be cheaper, net of merit aid, than some in-state Publics… especially the UC system which is currently $26,000 (fees, room, board, books) all in for nine months, living in the dorms. Examples of cost effective OOS Publics for non-NMFs include all the SUNYs, plus University of Minnesota.</p></li>
</ul>
<p>Having said that, the kernel of your thinking is correct. There are however those who have decided now is the time to relocate from the East to the WEst Coast, from the Midwest to the South, etc., and choose a highly ranked OOS Public in a geographic area that is attractive to them, and where they think they will want to develop their career post-college.</p>