<p>You telling me human-animal sex should be legal?</p>
<p>Should polygamy be legal? Should class A drugs be legal? Should under-age sex be legal? Even if everyone is consenting?</p>
<p>You telling me human-animal sex should be legal?</p>
<p>Should polygamy be legal? Should class A drugs be legal? Should under-age sex be legal? Even if everyone is consenting?</p>
<p>^Animals and minors are irrelevant to this argument because they can’t consent in the same way that human adults can.</p>
<p>Yes, Yes, and HELL YES (Well, they should move the age of consent down to 12…still can’t have people doing babies.)</p>
<p>Even if adults can consent to things, GAY SEX is just as bad as Class A drugs or polygamy - both are detrimental to society and have heavy demerit aspects, and are UNDESIRABLE, especially from a biblical perspective. </p>
<p>Not to mention its UNNATURAL (i mean, how are women meant to do it, and anal is just nasty, especially two guys…)</p>
<p>^ What do two people in the bedroom have anything to do with you? I can’t see how that would affect YOUR life at all.</p>
<p>Yeah, a father and his two year old daughter in their bedroom. Having penetrative sex. Wouldn’t affect MY life at all either.</p>
<p>How is it unnatural? I mean it’s a myth that homosexuals caused AIDS. It’s infantile to believe that.</p>
<p>AIDS can be caused from both heterosexual and homosexual intercourse.</p>
<p>You can’t control what chemically happens in your brain.</p>
<p>Underage sex depends on AOC.</p>
<p>Your points are moot and utterly childish in nature.</p>
<p>How is it unnatural? Because like genders can’t breed. </p>
<p>One of my friends always says that even ANIMALS know better than us, I mean animals realise that intercourse occurs between a male and a female…!!!</p>
<p>We’re far more advanced than animals, but you’re POV is that they chose to be that way. Which is ■■■■■■■■, imo.</p>
<p>REPRODUCTION is the product of a male and a female. Intercourse, while commonly between male and female, is not limited to just between those two genders.</p>
<p>[Homosexual</a> behavior in animals - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia](<a href=“http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual_behavior_in_animals]Homosexual”>Homosexual behavior in animals - Wikipedia)</p>
<p>Other animals have homosexual behaviors too. Its not just humans. IT IS NATURAL.</p>
<p>writtennthestars: There’s a difference between rape and consent. Oh. And some animals ARE gay. Look up ‘homosexual animals’. </p>
<p>And those saying that it’s not a choice: Um… so are you saying that you choose to be attracted only to the opposite sex?</p>
<p>No, we are inherently bisexual in nature. That degree of bisexuality varies however.</p>
<p>Could that degree be minute to where we don’t notice? Yes.</p>
<p>And those saying that it is a choice: Who would want to choose to be discriminated against? Why would anyone want to go through life knowing that because of who they are that they will endure constant discrimination?</p>
<p>We’re more advanced than animals, yet we don’t even realise that god did not create man and woman to have sex with people of the same gender??? </p>
<p>You see, the primary reason for intercourse, it reproduction. It’s been this way for centuries, and of course the orgasmic response of intercourse is there to encourage reproduction. </p>
<p>Unfortunately, some choose to abuse this privelege, and have sex with their own gender for their own personal benefit, disregarding the adverse affect on them, and of course society.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Drugs kills people. Gay marriage doesn’t kill people. Biblical perspective, even according to the Gospel itself, does not overlap into temporal authority.</p>
<p>Societally, we have accepted intercourse for pleasure as well. Even heterosexuals have sex for pleasure. Sure, it’s been this way for centuries, but times change. I’m positive homosexuals existed centuries ago, as well. Actually, the Greeks were a bit homosexual. Most was non-penetrative, however.</p>
<p>Your use of God as a justification is null, if we’re going about this secularly, without religion.</p>
<p>Guys, don’t waste your evening away arguing with writtennthestars. I’m pretty sure he/she is just ■■■■■■■■ or being “funny.”</p>
<p>[YouTube</a> - EAT DA POO POO](<a href=“EAT DA POO POO - YouTube”>EAT DA POO POO - YouTube) hehehe</p>
<p>Anyway, what can I say. lets be an anarchist society.</p>
<p>Hey, I love my government. Anarchy is bleh. Because someone in power always ends up taking over.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>You are correct to some extent, I don’t actually have that much against it, however if we accept your comment, you’re telling me that anyone who rejects gay marriage is a ■■■■■…</p>