<p>I think its just an artifact of testing and how we define “IQ”. </p>
<p>If IQ testing had an attention-span measurement, perhaps with a focus on listening skills, I bet this generation would do a whole lot worse than previous generations. </p>
<p>But the tests are all structured around rapid-fire multiple choice type questions – and everyone now spends their whole lives preparing to perform well on that type of test – so the scores go up. </p>
<p>“IQ” is just a category that reflects a lot of cultural assumptions about what counts as “smart”. For example, brain scientists know that proficiency in multiple languages has lasting, positive effects on brain functions – but there’s never been an IQ test geared to testing multilingual ability. Creativity is an important mental skill that leads to superior problem-solving and inventiveness, but it’s hard to design a way to test and measure that. </p>
<p>It is true that people who do well on IQ tests tend to be “smart” at the stuff that academicians and educators think is important. But it’s circular reasoning.</p>