<p>
[quote]
Sorry to say, most people in the US and overseas do not know W&M and often mistake it for a private, Catholic school. Many students think that graduate schools/law schools/medical schools give slack to W&M students for admission because of its difficult reputation. This is wishful thinking. If someone from a overlap school such as Georgetown or Vanderbilt has a higher GPA than a student at W&M, they are more likely to get in than the W&M student (in addition to other factors). Therefore, if you are considering going on with your education, why would you want to put yourself in the position of getting an A- (that’s a 3.7 folks) when you know you should have gotten an A and would have gotten one if you would have attended another school. Why put yourself through that? Even explaining to professors that you may be wanting to go for a PhD and teach is not good enough for W&M. You still get the A- or B+ when you know that you attended every class and participated in class discussions and done well on assignments [ /quote]</p>
<p>So, basically, you think W&M should indulge in grade inflation to match what you think its reputation is? How do you think a reputation for “academic rigor” is achieved? “Show up and get an A?” Yes, it’s hard to get a 4.0 - near-impossible in hard sciences - but it’s supposed to be. Most people who choose to attend know this, and choose W&M <em>because</em> of this. It’s probably <em>the</em> prevailing stereotype about W&M students - a bunch of “grade-grinding, work-aholic nerds who never leave the library, except to commit suicide.” While that’s ridiculous hyperbole, there’s a grain of truth in there. W&M does have a lot of spectacularly intelligent students, with a diverse range of talents and interests. This can be intimidating. I’m sorry if that reputation caught you unawares. </p>
<p>I think your assertion that many people think W&M is a “private, Catholic” school is true among the population at-large - and we know how influential they are in graduate school admissions, right?</p>
<p>If you can find an admissions counselor at a top-25 grad school in the United States that isn’t well aware of W&M’s academic reputation, then clearly, they’re not qualified for their job. (Not the same thing as saying they don’t exist - I wouldn’t go <em>that</em> far… :)) </p>
<p>However, since W&M undergrads have higher success rates at gaining graduate school admissions than “cohort” schools, most people would conclude that W&M’s grading policy isn’t (overly) detrimental to gaining acceptance to graduate school. There may be problems in your own application that you aren’t considering - for example, you may have a less-than enthusiastic recommendation letter in your jacket, or a poor personal statement, or simply be a terrible interviewee. Or, simply a “victim” of the numbers game. I read recently that the average undergrad needs to apply to 14 medical schools to gain admission, and many students apply to 30 or more. They need to do this, because the admissions rate is like 2% - and that from a self-selecting group of pre-meds. </p>
<p>I suggest you read up on Princeton’s grade inflation stance, and the results - [Admins:</a> Data suggest law, medical school admissions unaffected by deflation - The Daily Princetonian](<a href=“http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2009/11/17/24452/]Admins:”>http://www.dailyprincetonian.com/2009/11/17/24452/)</p>
<p>Anyway, good luck - graduate school admissions can be almost cruel, and I sympathize for where you’re at.</p>