<p>Just looked at a PR practice test.</p>
<p>Is it just me / PR or is the world history subject test very specific / detail oriented when compared to the World History AP test?</p>
<p>There were a bunch of questions in the subject practice test concerning minute details and obscure quotes.</p>
<p>Bump 10char</p>
<p>I noticed that too.</p>
<p>lots of quotes is the only thing i noticed.</p>
<p>Well, did you also take the AP?</p>
<p>It’s really specific compared to AP questions.</p>
<p>Well, did you also take the AP?</p>
<p>It’s really specific compared to AP questions. </p>
<p>I took the kaplan one it was the same as ap except it had more quotes and more modern stuff. I think it was harder than AP but maybe it’s cause our teacher didnt focus on modern stuff as AP isn’t very focused on it(or kaplan is biased and wants to undereport ur diagnostic score)</p>
<p>I just took the WHAP exam this past may and I’m studying to take the WH SAT II this coming Saturday… I feel like the SAT II is a loottt harder than the AP was. It seems a lot more specific and small-detail oriented… I’m hoping it’s just that my review book is harder than the actual test though… I’m using Kaplan’s, too. I’m really nervous now though because according to my practice AP tests I was in the mid-low 5, high 4 range, and according to the practice SAT II I’d get around a 700 or even lower. =[</p>