<p>If you take any percentile chances that people give you seriously, you are crazy or misinformed. It’s not realistic. What is realistic, is for people to give feedback about the strengths and weaknesses of your application, and let you infer from there.</p>
<p>710 on the SAT math section is not killer. Not ideal, but not at the level that will get you rejected. My worst subject grades-wise was also math, and I got a 2 on the AP Calc BC test, and I got in, so apparently that won’t kill you. You need some way to establish that you have enough math talent to do the MIT math requirements - if you can figure that out you’ll probably be okay in that regard.</p>
<p>My biggest worry about your stats is that you seem to have a C- in something from freshman year (and your freshman grades in general are kind of low), but you don’t seem to have had anything like that since then. I have no idea what a grade of ‘H’ means. Your upperclass grades and the rest of your stats look fine. Your overall GPA is more than good enough.</p>
<p>Your Science Olympiad medals are great (better than I did :)), as are your prizes in game development competitions. The Loebner Prize is cool. Quiz Bowl is probably a smaller benefit, but still a benefit. Research is good! Tutoring and coaching is good. NMSF won’t get you anything; they’re a dime a dozen in the applicant pool.</p>