<p>Wow I decided yesterday to take the SAT II math. I didn't have any prep books or nothing. I take it today. SO EASY. God, I feel bad for all you fools who programmed stuff. I got an 800 so easy on that test without even opening a prep book. Chemistry, on the other, hand high 750's. What do you guys think.</p>
<p>I feel the same for Math Level 2. </p>
<p>That is all.</p>
<p>Wait I mean a 790 >.>. i skipped 2 and missed 3.</p>
<p>No, 44.25/50 is definately an 800.</p>
<p>Indeed, indeed. I feel sorry for the programming people; that definitely wouldn't have helped at all.</p>
<p>I used a scientfic. No need for a graphing calc</p>
<p>how'd you feel on chem? i thought it was super hard.</p>
<p>Na chem was easy too. just messed up some of the True/false ones and a little on MC.</p>
<p>i completely missed true/false</p>
<p>what'd you say for the first 5 questions? ways to separate...</p>
<p>I can't say on here but I know I got them all right >.<.</p>
<p>Wow, you're kinda right. I didn't have any programs on my calculator, but I did spend quite a few hours painstakingly typing in formulas for trig identities, etc. And I didn't use a single one LMAO</p>
<p>But on the other hand, I do feel like the 14 (not exaggerating) practice tests I did were helpful.</p>
<p>I just copied a few programs from Barron's to make life easier. Didn't bother with them on the test, though; I did nearly all the calculations manually, even the ones which were programmed such as distance from one point to another. I did a lot of practice tests; ~20, if I'm not mistaken. I did all 15 in one Rusen Meylani book, and about four or five in Barron's. I believe that made a lot of difference. They do overprepare you, IMO, but Rusen Meylani's stuff is very worth it. Barron's teaches you things like De Moivre's theorem, which you don't need. Meylani is more realistic, but often gives the hardest questions imaginable that can come out on the test. As a result, it's very good prep.</p>
<p>"I can't say on here but I know I got them all right >.<."</p>
<p>umm can you pm me or something? or is that not allowed either?</p>
<p>Ok they were
1. magnet
2. filter
3. chromo.
4. distil</p>
<p>^ No, I got something different for the second one.</p>
<p>what was the filter question?</p>
<p>that was the one that was definetly right.</p>
<p>to separare a precip from a solution u filter.</p>
<p>Hey Gyros321 that's what I got too. You used filter to separate the precipitate (iodide) from the supernatant. All the other choices dont make sense. Does anyone know the curve for this test? The Barron's curve said 75-85 is still 800 but that seems too lenient to me.</p>
<p>yeah me too. i wanna know. i wish it was like Barrons. Then I might still have a shot at an 800.</p>