Wow. Ron Paul.

<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sy4Eugc0Xls%5B/url%5D"&gt;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sy4Eugc0Xls&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p>

<p>He won't be a president. I can't believe he got this far with his reasoning and clear sense.</p>

<p>It seems like this guy is the only one out there who is not high on crack/cocaine like Bush, Hilary, Obama, and other interesting people. </p>

<p>Also seems like democratic/republican ideals and reckless, dumb patriotism counts more than clear reasoning.</p>

<p>I'm shocked and stunned to see someone who can think with his brain.</p>

<p>PS. Look at the interviewer. That guy makes me want to smack him in the head.</p>

<p>How the hell is he connecting what Paul says with accusation of US? What the hell is he on?</p>

<p>His economic policy could use a bit of revamping......</p>

<p>I love his position on limited government, privacy, and gun control. I do hope he makes it to the nomination, if for no other reason than that Giulliani is a democrat in republican clothes and most others are idiots.</p>

<p>I think Ron Paul was right and Giuliani is completely wrong. He had no right to interrupt Paul during his 30 seconds. Just because Giuliani happened to be the mayor of 9/11 he thinks that he can use the 9/11 card for everything and its just annoying.</p>

<p>I really love how genuine he is and how he is willing to expose our foreign policy for what it has been.</p>

<p>Funny how truth can be seen as a breathe of fresh air. At least he was given a forum in the debate, and hopefully will continue to be invited to the televised debates. I thought it interesting to see the spin by Fox networks who asked for a vote of "the winner" by text messages, and then had to deal with the large percentage of votes for Paul--instead of Romney or Guiliani. It suggests that those voters who use text messaging will be a powerhouse in the final stats.</p>

<p>Wow! Kick A! I just might vote Republican if Ron Paul gets the nomination!</p>

<p>Key, "if Ron Paul gets the nomination!" I don't think he will.</p>

<p>Well we can hope.</p>

<p>Yeah, it'd be a refreshing change.</p>

<p>I'd have to confess this is the first time I ever found myself seriously considering voting for a Republican. I've always said I vote for the person, not the party, but I've just never liked the Republican candidate before. It's interesting and refreshing.</p>

<p>Another reason why I'm working with people to get Fred Thompson to run for President. That and hoping that he will do it. </p>

<p>I don't really care for any of the Republican candidates at this point.</p>

<p>Guiliani is an *******. Ron Paul actually puts out valid, logical arguments against America's current policy, and Guiliani spews some patriotic BS and everybody's on his side all of a sudden.</p>

<p>Yes, that was very depressing to see some GOP guy saying that RP should not be able to participate in debates anymore. So much for free speech huh, much less logic.</p>

<p>
[quote]
Yes, that was very depressing to see some GOP guy saying that RP should not be able to participate in debates anymore. So much for free speech huh, much less logic.

[/quote]

Hmm. Is it right that GOP can restrain anyone from speaking on their half? RP can go independent anytime and no one will stop him from participating in debates, right?</p>

<p>Well, I believe it was only with regards to GOP debates, like the one we are talking about. They are wanting to keep him from being able to participate in GOP debates along with the other presidential prospects.</p>

<p>I sort of like him.</p>

<p>
[quote]
They are wanting to keep him from being able to participate in GOP debates along with the other presidential prospects.

[/quote]
</p>

<p>Who is and Why?</p>