<p>
</p>
<p>They could crash them, or repair them, or paint them. It is not sufficient for characterization of problematic technical redundancy for one of the word sets to be inferential from the other; they must doubly convey the message.</p>
<p>Additionally, the ostensible apparent meaning of a sentence should not be changed; the only way this principle could be respected if “to driving” were the error is to eliminate “driving” and regard it as implicit. But again, other words could fit. If true redundancy were to exist, eliminating the word would make no change in the possible meaning of the sentence.</p>