writing question

<p>In eighteenth-century France, economic inequalities made many people angry, and a violent revolution was fueled.</p>

<p>b: angry; it fueled a violent revolution.
c: angry, and this anger fueled a violent revolution.
e: angry; thus fueling a violent revolution.</p>

<p>ok please tell me if i'm wrong here:
E: incorrect because a comma has to follow the "thus" if it was "; thus, fueling a violent revolution "it would be correct though.
b. we don't know what fueled the revolution (it is ambiguous)
so c is correct.</p>

<p>am i right about why e and b are wrong btw? (mainly e)</p>

<p>b it is a not right pronoun ,it should be plural ,and you are right about e</p>

<p>ok so from what i understand, if there isn’t a comma after “however/thus/therefore” it’s wrong right?</p>

<p>ye because comma , they however/thus/therefore are adv and the sentence will become run on sentence that’s the basic thing you ought to know</p>

<p>e is wrong because the part after the semicolon is a phrase and not a sentence.</p>

<p>A semicolon separates two sentences. It’s basically the same as a fullstop.</p>

<p>hoping for better, how is this not a sentence:</p>

<p>thus, a violent revolution was fueled.
it is a complete sentence no?</p>

<p>Take another look at the option e.</p>

<p>e) angry; thus fueling a violent revolution.</p>

<p>Is that a sentence?</p>

<p>lol hopingforbetter, i see misread the sentence XD… thanks yeah it isn’t a sentence since theree isn’t a verb.</p>